As we saw in chapter 2, ' ' Types of Orao' ' , the conjuncts registered in the Bible had been imbudas of ' ' Palavra' ' , and the promises had been always invoked. They allow to tell to them a miraculous experience me that I lived using this wonderful resource of the conjunct: Certain occasion, I was called to pray for a young completely demoniac paralytic and. This fact occurred in day 23 of December of 1990, to 17h. It found me jejuando and praying, as of custom, in the temple, when my wife and the Rosana sister Relative, cooperadora in the workmanship, to call had come me to pray for a young paralytic. Its relatives were aflitos, therefore it was in a deplorable state, tormented for a legion of demons.

Its paralysis age of demonic nature. I was until a marries of the young paralytic. Arriving there, vi the state of panic of the youngster, but trusting fully the infallible promises of the Word of God, April the Bible and I read what it is written in Landmarks, chapter 16, versicles 17-20. I gave emphasis in versicles 17,18. Soon after the reading and the brief explanation, I spoke for all trusting the Word: ' ' Today God will free this young for the power of the name of Jesus' '. After this affirmation of faith, we adentramos in one room to pray and to exert the faith in the following promise of the Word: ' ' In my name, they will banish demnios' '. When I started to pray, based not on mine jejum or on my conjunct, but in the promises of the Word, came on me a so powerful unction it coated that me with a supernatural authority. Then I looked the eyes in the young (Amarildo was called) and said: ' ' Jesus to free goes you now! ' ' I imposed my hand on the youngster and prayed the promise of the Word: ' ' Sir, You said in your Word: in My Name, they will banish demnios' '.

Mark Granovetter

Almost two decades later, Burt (1992) developed the boarding of Granovetter through the concept of ' ' holes estruturais' '. Burt arrived to use the term capital stock, as Bourdieu, defining it of instrumental form. In the case of Burt, however, the capital stock seats in the relative scarcity of bows entretecidos in nets, and not in its density. Burt sees the capital stock as: ' ' more general friends, colleagues and contacts through which we accede the chances of use of the proper financial capital or humano' '. work of Loury opened way, however, for an analysis more refined of the same process, taken the handle for Coleman, nominated in what it respects to the paper of the capital stock in the creation of human capital. In its initial analysis of the concept, Coleman receives the contribution of Loury, as the ones of Ben-Porath economist and sociologists Nan Lin and Mark Granovetter. James Coleman left itself to influence, for Granovetter to make its study on capital stock.

He works with the concept of capital stock in an individual perspective and of the rational choices. For Coleman (1986), the capital stock is not a singular entity, but a variety of different entities that possess two characteristics in common: they consist of some aspect of a social structure and facilitate some actions of the individuals that are in the interior of this structure. The capital stock, in this direction, is productive, since it becomes possible that if they reach objectives that would not be reached in its absence. It is the question of the reciprocity. After de Bourdieu, Loury and Coleman, diverse other analyses of the capital stock have been published. In 1990, W.E. Baker defined the concept as ' ' a resource that the actors make to derive from specific social structures and use later for the accomplishment of its interests; resource this servant for alterations in the relation between atores' ' (BAKER, 1990:619).