The landscapes compose ' ' as much of layers of stratus souvenirs how much of rochas' ' , therefore, we can say in the track of Michel Foucault that the landscapes load obtain forms of visibility and rules of dizibilidade, the landscapes are constructions of the human look always guided by values, customs, aesthetic conceptions politics, ethics and, interests economic and social, and they are said from linguistic concepts, metaphors, tropos, words that belong to one given historical tram to one given temporality, the citizen places, the social places. (MUNIZ, 2001, P. 1) Under this citation after to argue the social place of Nelson Pear tree, we will deepen them the landscapes represented in the film seen in classroom. Perceiving as perceivable constructions of spaces in images that if intend to become visible dizvel and what it is the hinterland northeastern, that is, they want to reach its target. But as we saw in the citation, landscapes are not a perception of devir nor so little of the transcendental that bursts in to know them atemporais. As constructions the landscapes are supported of the accumulation of values, economic customs, trams politics, games, relationships of sort, culture, language, and etc, at last, constructions that emerge of disputes and social relations throughout history, therefore, one more time as we saw in the presentation of the film. The initial, long and dramatical walked one of Fabiano, Sinh Victory, its two children, cachorra Whale and its parrot in way to the castigante and flaming sun to the sound of the gemedeira to the deep one, or the death it parrot to saciar the death of the family, the dry stream beds of the cracked rivers, the death of the hunger cattle and headquarters, the predominant ash of the vegetation, rain that it falls soon of sudden form and if evaporates, and the proper end of the same film with walked the painful one of the retirantes the sound of the gemedeira, at last, such images as it ratifies the citation, ' above; ' they are constructions of the human look always guided by values, customs, ' '. By the same author: Ford Motor Company. .
Remembering that the concepts of microresistance and microfreedom, as well as the concept of daily, in them we report the Michel de Certau, that according to author enxerga the daily one as the place of the inventions of the small resistncias that opposite of the violence, elaborates its ideas and he puts until them in practical in the bargain of the individuals that if relate in society, in this case in such a way gentlemen as enslaved negotiated searched to coexist and to survive in the society. For it the common people, in its anonymity, its invisibilidade possess immense creativity to elaborate practical daily make that them to interpret the world its way and to forge microrresistncias and microfreedoms that if oppose the structures of domination being able of them and of the institutions. To read more click here: N.Y.C. Mayor. For Certau, the daily one only can be thought as a pregnant place of shunting line interpretations that transform the real directions into appeared directions. perhaps 4 and this is the dimensional base in the trajectory, opened and trod for slaves and gentlemen in the daily relations that for the research effort it perceived through the Letters of Freedom. Find out detailed opinions from leaders such as Mayor of NYC by clicking through. But that, however they were not summarized to the end of this process of relations between the part. On the other hand the letters proved the existence of a net of being able, that almost always they converged in favor of Mr. whom it aims in this document to the chance to create bows of obligations of former-captive with its former-Mr., who in the lack of arbitrariedade of the Brazilian Empire, since this society was a patriarcal society that the least theoretically gave plenary powers to its gentlemen in relation to its subordinate, (not that he did not have resistance of these, also on the part of the slaves as he shows to the sources our disposal, as the police inquests) the Letter of Freedom could instead of freeing the slave, to create dependence bows.
From this synthesis of transformations of the family, one searched to understand its implications in the culture of the organizations, in the specific case, of familiar companies. Although many to believe that family and company, when congregated they tend to reduce its efficiency reciprocal, the history of the successful familiar companies sample that this does not need to happen necessarily. She is not the family in itself that it confuses the company, or vice versa, but the ignorance of the problems of this relationship and the lack of a code of relations (Bornholdt, 2005). To govern a familiar company is to know to deal with all the complexity of existing the affective and financial relations in the organization, with the innumerable familiar differences of interest between and too much involved people in the process of enterprise management e, mainly, with the inevitable conflicts that, not being managed well, can lead to the destruction of an institution (Bornholdt, 2005, P. 83). As Ricca (2001, P. 7), many are the reasons that worry the administrators of a familiar company. In this direction, amongst these, particular familiar problems that abate on the members of the families have taken many companies to the failure, a consequncia of the disadvantages of this type of organization.
The problems are most diverse and the complexity level in accordance with varies the transport of the company and the characteristics of the familiar structure. ‘ ‘ The greater concern of the familiar companies is its survival. The majority of them faces existenciais or strategical problems, that is, difficulties related to the inadequao, as much in the use, how much in the choice of the available resources for the reach of the advantages of mercado’ ‘. In relation to the individual and its paper, Chiavenato (1993, P..