The Acceptance

– The social malaise also is sicoptico Of natural way some people have abilities that make the relations easy, but in spite of this facility also they can feel certain malaise sometimes. Abilities like the empathy, that is to say being able to put themselves in the place of the other, can have their indirect effect. If one perceives easily how the others feel, it will be able to be oppressed frequently because it will look for to be able not to bother, not to generate conflict or to avoid that it is erased to him of something negative. It is easy that in spite of the social success the malaise levels are higher than would be desirable. Especially during the adolescence to be capable socially cannot be very traumatic.

This time of the life the group becomes referring the main one. To be rejected is hard and usually has great future repercussion. For that reason an adolescent usually is so noticeable and usually is so faithful to his group of friendships. The acceptance necessity becomes some cases in the tyranny of the acceptance. In the continuous one of social anxiety, we can value from the precise experiences of social anxiety to the social phobia.

First it is common in all the people, the phobia is much more minority but relatively frequent in the general population, between 3 and a 13% according to different studies. When the malaise becomes bloqueante, that is to say, when the person avoids social situations recurrently not to be bad in spite of wishing the relations, it is then when she becomes necessary to put means to confront the problem. Otherwise this malaise can increase and in addition to become general to other situations. Sometimes the people use different strategies to get rid short term of the malaise, for example: to speak to avoid uncomfortable silencios much, to look for the company of the people who give more confidence him within a group, to shut up themselves not to fall in ridiculous situation, not to ask doubts not to seem ignorant what more usually it is avoided Generally is to be the attention center, is by which situations as to speak in public they can get to be very angustiantes.

Enguita Students

Therefore, the cited authors expose the modern school system, composed of a pastoral and organized, pedagogy therefore linked in parts to a bureaucratic government. Therefore, it is possible to say that it has not been easy to educate in the knowledge society, where the students are highly integrated into networks of communication (internet for example) and, in some ways are, the biggest attractions in his classroom room. Pini (2005, 03), exposes the pressure increases in the context of the so-called knowledge society when donning in fabric trial knowledges and the place of teaching with respect to students. On the other hand, Enguita, (2006, p. 42), runs that it is not, therefore, simply, become familiar with the use and management of information.

Is it may seem, since then, due to lack of information, but also by excess if you don’t know what to do with it. Knowledge is precisely the ability to resolve and manage that information. According to Enguita (20076, p. 55), surely it goes without saying that a broader and less dogmatic teacher training, curriculum guidelines more responsive to the changing nature of society, more fluid relations and supplies between the public authorities and minorities need. Based on the above statement, it is important to note, in order to improve the quality of education in Brazil, need, before above all, strong investment in the improvement of the procedures for initial and recurrent training of teachers, administrators and professionals in education, focusing the statutes and the conditions for the development of the school pedagogical work, since these professionals can only respond to what you possess the knowledge and skills, personal qualities, professional opportunities and motivations that are needed to monitor the evolution of the situation current education, due to which these aspects that influence the daily practice of the proceedings of educators and students. In accordance with the point of view of Davis (2002), evaluation is an instrument at the service of the management of the schools, and for both, awake evaluation resistance in the majority of people, because, traditionally, it has been used as an instrument of control to adjust the characteristics of the needs of the individuals given situations or circumstances. .